[Iccrg] Proposal for ICCRG operations

[Douglas Leith]

>So, the panel isn't for several hours (at PFLDnet 2006) but one thing  
>that has become clear to me so far is that this community has not  
>converged on metrics and scenarios for evaluation.  The TMRG work is  
>really needed to make progress.

Lets see what the panel outcome is, but maybe you're a little too pessimistic here.  

My impression is that there actually is really quite a good consensus of the broad framework for testing.  Tests by ourselves and the north carolina folks have converged to very similar setups and metrics.  There is even a common subset of tests that we have both been using and that also seem to have a wider ground-swell of support.  Fertile ground for TMRG acitivity.

Doug
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/pipermail/iccrg/attachments/20060203/aebed4ab/attachment.html