[Iccrg] ctcp review: big picture issues (3 of 4)

[Lachlan Andrew]

On 29/11/2007, weddy at grc.nasa.gov <weddy at grc.nasa.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:13:31PM -0500, Mark Allman wrote:
> Would it be correct to say that we think for a scheme to be called "safe for
> production Internet use" that its parameters need to all be accompanied
> by some particular values or guidance on a range of values?

Yep, I'd vote for that as a requirement.  The range could be specified
as "arbitrary", provided there was a justification that "arbitrary"
values are safe.

Cheers,
Lachlan

-- 
Lachlan Andrew  Dept of Computer Science, Caltech
1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
Ph: +1 (626) 395-8820    Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603
http://netlab.caltech.edu/~lachlan