[Iccrg] Re: [AVT] Off-Topic: TCP congestion control: Reno vs. Vegas
lars.eggert at nokia.com
Tue Jul 8 09:45:24 BST 2008
AVT is not the correct list for this topic. I suggest the ICCRG list
On 2008-7-7, at 18:30, ext Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:
> Dear all, I'm involved in some congestion control tests using Linux
> boxes which use TCP Reno as the default TCP congestion control.
> I read that TCP Vegas is better than Reno because it measures the
> round-trip delay from all the transmitted packets and after that, in
> case of congestion, the data rate decreases faster than measuring the
> packet loss.
> What TCP stack do you recommend to avoid congestion control in
> "best-effort" scenarios for TCP traffic ???
> Special thanks.
> Alejandro Cabrera Obed
> aco1967 at gmail.com
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
More information about the Iccrg