[Iccrg] Re: [AVT] Off-Topic: TCP congestion control: Reno vs. Vegas

Lars Eggert lars.eggert at nokia.com
Tue Jul 8 09:45:24 BST 2008


Hi,

AVT is not the correct list for this topic. I suggest the ICCRG list  
(CC'ed.)

Lars

On 2008-7-7, at 18:30, ext Alejandro Cabrera Obed wrote:

> Dear all,  I'm involved in some congestion control tests using Linux
> boxes which use TCP Reno as the default TCP congestion control.
>
> I read that TCP Vegas is better than Reno because it measures the
> round-trip delay from all the transmitted packets and after that, in
> case of congestion, the data rate decreases faster than measuring the
> packet loss.
>
> What TCP stack do you recommend to avoid congestion control in
> "best-effort" scenarios for TCP traffic ???
>
> Special thanks.
>
>
> -- 
> Alejandro Cabrera Obed
> aco1967 at gmail.com
> www.alejandrocabrera.com.ar
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt




More information about the Iccrg mailing list