[Iccrg] ICCRG experimental CC reviews

[Michael Welzl]

> There were many stylistic issues the the CTCP draft, like not
> specifying parameter values,  the SHOUD/MUST/... terminology, what is
> normative vs informative..
> 
> It would be good to write up a "how-to" for drafts, specifying what
> format the drafts should have, and what pitfalls to avoid.  That
> should speed the process up for future proposals.

This is just an IETF standard, and must therefore already
exist somewhere... a few hints are at http://www.ietf.org/ID.html


> Guidelines would help.  Perhaps we should specify that the draft
> should point to independent tests (on a non-buggy implementation).  I
> don't think we should mandate independent re-implementation, but it
> would be good to encourage having at least one open-source
> implementation.

- that should be clear without a guideline IMO.

Cheers,
Michael