[Iccrg] Meeting @ Atlanta IETF

[Lachlan Andrew]

Greetings Murari / all,

I think that the signalling itself may be suitable for TCPM, but there
is plenty of research scope for the many different uses it can be put
to.  If we stick to the original view of "ECN must be treated as loss"
then there isn't much to do, but looking at ways to combine ECN marks
from multiple packets to signal richer information is research, and so
is deciding what to do with that richer information.

$0.02
Lachlan

On 11 October 2012 11:07, Murari Sridharan <muraris at microsoft.com> wrote:
> Chair hat off, I think this topic is less research and more useful pursued in TCPM.
>
> Chair hat on: sounds interesting we should talk about it :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iccrg-bounces at cs.ucl.ac.uk [mailto:iccrg-bounces at cs.ucl.ac.uk] On Behalf Of Michael Welzl
>
> I think it would be quite fitting, especially because the applications of such a scheme seem to be more research'y right now...
>
>
> On Oct 5, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
>
>> Should we discuss better ECN sigaling and feedback here too?
>> I thought that's a hot topic.

-- 
Lachlan Andrew  Centre for Advanced Internet Architectures (CAIA)
Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
<http://caia.swin.edu.au/cv/landrew>
Ph +61 3 9214 4837