[Iccrg] Why don't we stop treating ECN and loss similarly?

[ken carlberg]

part of my understanding comes from individual conversations with carriers from a couple of different countries, so I can't provide a pointer to that.  But indirectly, you can see some of the interest in the form of some standards work in the ITU with participation by industry on H.248.82  "Gateway Control Protocol: Explict Congestion Notification Support", from SG 16 dated May 2012.  And there are other addendums to this base document, but I don't follow SG 16 closely.

-ken


On Oct 29, 2012, at 7:10 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, ken carlberg wrote:
> 
>> as for interest in ECN, it exists in some planned deployments of LTE for the toll-quality VoIP applications/services.
> 
> Really? Do you have some pointers to this, my understanding was that VoLTE would be on a dedicated bearer with that kind of QoS that 3GPP always has done (per bearer, but doing FIFO within the bearer).
> 
> -- 
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se