[Iccrg] Proposal for ICCRG operations
Saverio Mascolo
mascolo at poliba.it
Mon Feb 6 18:29:20 GMT 2006
> I think you are assuming that the queue occupancy for each flow is
> constant over time. If you relax that assumption, then you no longer
> have the implication.
>
> There may exist viable control schemes which control the flows (and
> have whatever other desirables properties) while keeping the average
> queue occupancy small.
>
> Do you agree?
then i agree and is necessary to decide how to fix the queue dynamics.
>
> > i have read somewhere, maybe on s. floud homepage, a note on "why
> > control queue length should not be a target". i am not sure, but i think
> > she had similar arguments.
>
> I looked on her web pages at http://www.icir.org/floyd/papers.html
> and http://www.icir.org/floyd/notes.html and did not manage to
> identify which note you would be refering to.
i am sure it was a note written by floyd. maybe she can help on this.
saverio
>
> > in other words, if you control queue at fixed value you would prevent
> > other flows to join.
>
> I think there must be assumptions in your reasoning that I did not
> mean to imply.
>
> -Tim Shepard
> shep at alum.mit.edu
More information about the Iccrg
mailing list