[Iccrg] Call for reviewers for CTCP

[Lars Eggert]

On 2007-8-22, at 5:12, ext Lachlan Andrew wrote:
> Before deciding on the safeness of CTCP, I'd recommend tidying up some
> loose ends in this draft, as below.  I think these are mainly problems
> with the explanations, rather than the algorithm.

Related to that, because CTCP - and the other upcoming proposals -  
aim to become Experimental protocol specifications, I'd highly  
recommend to use RFC2119 terminology (MUST/SHOULD/MAY/etc.) for the  
algorithm descriptions. At least once they hit the IETF that'll be  
important, and doing this now will probably clarify at least some of  
the ambiguities.

Lars
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2446 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/pipermail/iccrg/attachments/20070822/bf8453af/smime.bin