[Iccrg] Call for reviewers for CTCP

[Michael Welzl]

Okay now,

We have 2 volunteers (thanks!!). Before they start, I suggest
that the authors update their draft, based on the comments
from Lachlan in his prior email and the comment from Lars below.

Simply update, announce it to the list, and we will tell the
reviewers to get started

Cheers,
Michael


On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 09:49 +0300, Lars Eggert wrote:
> On 2007-8-22, at 5:12, ext Lachlan Andrew wrote:
> > Before deciding on the safeness of CTCP, I'd recommend tidying up some
> > loose ends in this draft, as below.  I think these are mainly problems
> > with the explanations, rather than the algorithm.
> 
> Related to that, because CTCP - and the other upcoming proposals -  
> aim to become Experimental protocol specifications, I'd highly  
> recommend to use RFC2119 terminology (MUST/SHOULD/MAY/etc.) for the  
> algorithm descriptions. At least once they hit the IETF that'll be  
> important, and doing this now will probably clarify at least some of  
> the ambiguities.
> 
> Lars