[Iccrg] RE: [ledbat] Ledbat presentation slots for Hiroshima

[Woundy, Richard]

I suspect the diff is against
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shalunov-ledbat-congestion-00, since
the previous draft prior to approval as an official WG item.

 

 

From: ledbat-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ledbat-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Murari Sridharan
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:10 PM
To: ledbat at ietf.org; iccrg at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ledbat] Ledbat presentation slots for Hiroshima

 

Here is the agenda. 

 

LEDBAT WG Meeting, IETF 76

Friday, November 13

Cattleya East

 

9:00 AM Preliminaries (10 mts)

 

9:10-9:40 Low Extra Delay Background  Transport (LEDBAT), S. Shalunov
(30 minutes)

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ledbat-congestion-00.txt

Looks like there were some minor edits made but the version is still 00?
Is this correct Stas?

http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=draft-ietf-ledbat-c
ongestion-00.txt

 

9:40-10:10 LEDBAT Practices and Recommendations for Managing Multiple
Concurrent TCP Connections, R. Penno (30 minutes)

http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-penno-ledbat-app-practices-recommendation
s-01.txt

 

10:10 - 10:30 Next Steps and Wrap-up (20 minutes)

 

Thanks

Murari 

 

From: ledbat-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ledbat-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Murari Sridharan
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 9:04 AM
To: ledbat at ietf.org; iccrg at cs.ucl.ac.uk
Subject: [ledbat] Ledbat presentation slots for Hiroshima

 

Hi,

 

We'll hopefully get the updated drafts soon. Meanwhile please send
agenda requests. We know we will have two slots for each of the WG
documents. Michael won't be making any updates to the LEDBAT survey
document for Hiroshima. 

 

Other than the above I'd like to propose a few topics that I think will
help the WG immensely. I am cross-posting the invite to ICCRG folks as
well. As we are working on finalizing a lower than best-effort transport
that is based on delay measurement there have been questions around
experimental data/discussion around proving/disproving late comer's
advantage, whether flows can be starved, fairness in the presence of
multiple flows etc. As with all congestion control laws the one being
discussed has a choice of parameter values to choose from. A lot of the
work here is building on earlier work on delay and loss based algorithms
so it would be good to hear views form others who have done this type of
work in the past. I know there are folks that have implementation
experience with delay and loss based algorithms. May be you have some
interesting data to share that is relevant to the problem being
discussed. You can look at the current proposal at
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shulanov-ledbat-congestion

 

If you are interested, please send us details including title/topic,
presenter name and requested time. 

 

Thanks

Murari 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/pipermail/iccrg/attachments/20091030/2c453162/attachment.html