[Sumover-tech] Re)VICh264 & Device Microsoft DV Camera and VCR

[Patcharee Basu]

Hi Doug,

Thank you very much for your quick reply. Let's continue after new year 
and have a nice holiday.

Best regards,
Patcharee
Douglas Kosovic wrote:
> Hi Patcharee,
>  
> I'm currently on holiday leave till 12th January and unfortunately can't 
> send you the modified file till I get back.
>  
> I was planning on doing modifications that added support small and 
> medium DV, plus support for more pixelformats (e.g YUV 4:2:0, 4:2:2 & 
> 4:4:4). Once completed, the changes will be SVN checked in.
>  
>  
> Doug
>  
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Patcharee Basu [mailto:yoo at soi.ne.jp]
> *Sent:* Wed 24/12/2008 4:37 PM
> *To:* Zen Kato
> *Cc:* Douglas Kosovic; sumover-tech at cs.ucl.ac.uk
> *Subject:* Re: [Sumover-tech] Re)VICh264 & Device Microsoft DV Camera 
> and VCR
> 
> Hello Doug and Zen,
> 
> Sorry for the long delay. I also confirm that the the white lines gone
> in vic-20081121 version.
> 
> Will this fix be included in the vic mpeg4 branch? I would like to
> compile it with the IPv6 support in Windows. Do you have any hints how
> to? I think the given instructions here is quite outdated.
> http://mediatools.cs.ucl.ac.uk/nets/mmedia/browser/vic/branches/mpeg4/win32/build_install.txt
> 
> Best regards,
> Patcharee
> Zen Kato wrote:
>  > Hi Doug,
>  >
>  > vic-20081121 works perfect on IEEE1394 without no white lines on my
>  > windows-2000. It works on mpeg4 and h264 large.
>  >
>  > This means that we can use IEEE1394,S-video and Composite signals
>  > to three PCs and could send the video to three unicast addresses(PCs).
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  >
>  > Zen
>  >
>  >
>  >
> 
>