[Iccrg] Soliciting input for cc. bibliography

[Katsushi Kobayashi]

Hello,

I believe single document is enough in this time.
If we decide to separate the document, the RG
contributions are also separated. The RG has not
been taken care in long-time. I believe we should
not split our "small" energy in this time.

We can split the document later, when we will decide
it.

--
Katsshi Kobayashi


On 2006/06/13, at 19:16, Michael Welzl wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> The first concrete step that we should take is to create
> an overview of current congestion control research. We
> really need to have the existing proposals documented
> somewhere in order to learn something (derive rules)
> from them.
>
> Keshav and I started with a small bibliography - a Wiki
> page that gives an overview of cc. overviews (a "meta"
> overview  :)   ), and we solicit input. See
> http://www1.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/ICCRG
>
> Speaking of overviews, there was this recent discussion
> about writing an overview of cc. related RFCs. I think
> that we should proceed with this, and I also think that
> we should write an overview of other cc. mechanisms. My
> question to the group is: should these be two separate
> documents or a single one?
>
> Cheers,
> Michael
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iccrg mailing list
> Iccrg at cs.ucl.ac.uk
> http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/iccrg