[Iccrg] Preliminary agenda for the next meeting

[Bob Briscoe]

Michael,

I'm not clear whether/how I need to register if I'm only going to 
attend the ICCRG (and the evening dinner) but not PFLDnet (as I have 
to be elsewhere Thu).


Bob

At 03:51 01/02/2008, Michael Welzl wrote:
>Dear all,
>
>Here's the first version of the agenda for our next
>meeting (Manchester, with Pfldnet 2008:
>http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/PFLDnet2008/  - this is
>the page to check for all logistics details).
>
> >From the input that I got, it is now clear that this
>meeting will only take a day, and that day will be
>Wednesday, the 5th of March. The PFLDNet reception
>will take place on the same day, after our meeting.
>
>The ICCRG meeting agenda is below and also at
>http://www3.tools.ietf.org/group/irtf/trac/wiki/Agenda08
>
>09:00 - 09:15 Michael Welzl: Welcome and agenda bashing
>09:15 - 10:15 Volker Hilt: SIP overload control
>10:15 - 10:45 Dimitri Papadimitriou: Open research issues in Internet
>congestion control
>10:45 - 11:00 Break
>11:00 - 12:00 Discussion of open issues in Internet congestion control
>12:00 - 13:00 Lunch
>13:00 - 13:30 Injong Rhee: CUBIC
>13:30 - 14:00 Doug Leith: CTCP evaluation results
>14:00 - 14:30 Lachlan Andrew: Getting more information from ECN bits
>15:15 - 15:30 Break
>15:30 - 16:30 Open discussion about future work
>
>
>---
>
>Some explanations / comments from my side:
>
>(as Lars also pointed out to me, but that's a 100% match
>with my personal opinion) - the congestion control community
>should not be stuck with TCP all the time; we really should
>try to look over the fence and see where else congestion
>control is needed. This is a part of the role that the
>"open issues in Internet CC." draft (which Dimitri
>will present) can take, and Volker Hilt's talk fits in
>there just perfectly.
>
>This is why we have the long slot about discussing open
>issues. We could use it to take another look at the
>open issues we already identified previously, and Lars
>offered to present some open issues in cc. from elsewhere
>in the IETF, which would also fit in that time slot.
>
>CUBIC, in the afternoon, is about the current state of
>the draft. Injong (or a colleague - he wasn't sure if
>he'll come himself, but somebody will definitely be there)
>should present the draft, comments he got, and how he
>intends to address them.
>
>Let me know if you have any comments - and, as you
>can tell, there would still be some time to squeeze
>in a short talk or two in the afternoon, if somebody
>wants to. The open discussion doesn't have to be that
>long (do we need it at all? I just put it there in
>case we want to go on discussing things...), and we
>could end slightly later (although not a lot).
>
>
>--------
>
>PARTICIPATION:
>
>If your name is not on the agenda, and you would to
>participate (and your name is not Filipe or Lars  :-)
>because these are the two that I already know about),
>drop me a line so I can put you on the list.
>
>
>Cheers,
>Michael
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Iccrg mailing list
>Iccrg at cs.ucl.ac.uk
>http://oakham.cs.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/iccrg

____________________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe, <bob.briscoe at bt.com>      Networks Research Centre, BT Research
B54/77 Adastral Park,Martlesham Heath,Ipswich,IP5 3RE,UK.    +44 1473 645196