[Iccrg] Re: [IRSG] AD review: draft-irtf-iccrg-welzl-congestion-control-open-research-07

[Michael Welzl]

Hi,

We want to do this revision. Thanks a lot for bringing these problems
to our attention!

Cheers,
Michael


On Jul 16, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Lars Eggert wrote:

> Hi,
>
> please find my RFC5742 review below. In short, there are no blocking  
> issues, but the document would be improved by a revision that fixes  
> the significant editorial nits in order to save the RFC Editor some  
> work.
>
> Please let me know if you want to do this revision, or if I should  
> move the document forward as-is.
>
> Lars
>
>
>
>  The document has a significant amount of ID-nits that should have  
> been
>  found - at the latest - during the IRSG review and fixed before this
>  was forwarded to the IESG. In short: missing status, no IANA section,
>  superfluous RFC2199 boilerplate and a HUGE list of missing or unused
>  references, splitting references into normative/informative, etc.
>  (Hint: you need to do the latter so idnits generates useful warnings
>  on missing/unused references.)
>
>  This is not a reason to hold up the document (per RFC5742), but since
>  the RFC Editor will have a very difficult time at guessing how these
>  should be fixed up before publication, you may want to fix these nits
>  for them, in order to speed up the document processing.
>
>
> Section 1., paragraph 1:
>>   This document, result of the ICCRG Research Group, describes some
>>   of the open research topics in the domain of Internet congestion
>>   control that are known today.
>
>  The introduction does not adequately describe what level of consensus
>  and review this document has received in the ICCRG. See RFC5743
>  Section 2.1.
>
>
> Section 3.3, paragraph 28:
>>     This issue is under discussion in the Transport Area Working  
>> Group.
>
>  Statements about which topics are being discussed where are unlikely
>  to have long-term archival interest. Suggest to rephrase. (There are
>  also other instances of this in the document.)
>
>
> Section 5., paragraph 0:
>> 5. References
>
>  Splitting references into normative and informative is a requirement
>  for RFCs, please do so.
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRSG mailing list
> IRSG at mailman.isi.edu
> http://mailman.isi.edu/mailman/listinfo/irsg